Key Issue 1: Growing Awareness
of Mental Health Disorders Among Youth in the General
Population
The Surgeon General's 2002 Report on Children's
Mental Health found that:
- Approximately 20% of children and adolescents
in the general youth population are experiencing a
mental disorder;
- Approximately 10% experience mental illness
severe enough to cause impairment at home, in school,
and in the community;
- Yet less than half will receive the treatment
that they need.
The release of this report shed light on the fact
that mental disorder among youth in the general population
was significantly higher than what was previously
believed.
Key Issue 2: The prevalence
of mental disorder among youth in the juvenile
justice system is two to three times higher than
among youth in the general population.
While the research base on this
issue is very much still developing, existing
research suggests that most youth in the juvenile
justice system, anywhere from 70 to 100%, have
a diagnosable mental disorder. (Otto et al.,
1992; Virginia Policy Design Team, 1994; Wierson,
Forehand and Frame, 1992)
Approximately one out of five (20%)
has a serious mental disorder. (Cocozza and Skowyra,
2000)
Some of the best information on
this issue is coming out of a study being conducted
by Dr. Linda Teplin at the Cook County detention
center in Chicago, Illinois. (Teplin et al.,
2002)
- Dr. Teplin is conducting a large-scale
study using a randomized sample and standardized
instruments (DISC) to collect mental health
and substance use prevalence data among youth
in the detention center.
- Her data suggests
that rates of mental disorder are high
among both boys and girls (66 % to 73% of youth
surveyed).
- These rates remain high even when
you eliminate conduct disorder from the
identified disorders- 60% of boys and 70% of
girls still meet criteria for some other psychiatric
disorder.
- Rates of mental disorder are consistently
higher for girls than for boys, especially
for affective and anxiety disorders.
Key Issue 3: There
is an increasing sense of awareness and crisis
surrounding the care and treatment of youth with
mental disorders in the juvenile justice system.
This is a population of youth whose
mental health needs have been neglected for a long
time. Now, attention is being paid in a way that
was largely absent ten years ago.
- Growing concern on the part of both
the juvenile justice and mental health systems
over the criminalization of mental illness. This
is a trend that we've seen at the adult level for
some time, and are now beginning to see at the
juvenile level as well.
- Increasing attention by the media,
advocacy organizations (NAMI, NMHA, Federation
of Families), and funding organizations (private
foundations like MacArthur and Casey, as well as
federal agencies such as SAMHSA and OJJDP).
- DOJ investigations into the conditions
of confinement of youth in juvenile detention
and correctional facilities across the country.
These investigations have consistently highlighted
the lack of appropriate screening, assessment and
treatment available to youth, the inappropriate
use of medication, and the inappropriate responses
to suicide threats. (DOJ, 2003)
Key
Issue 4: There are
a number of factors that are contributing to the
sense of crisis.
- There appears to be an increasing
number of youth with mental disorders entering
the juvenile justice system. The Texas Youth
Commission reported a 27% increase in the number
of youth with mental disorders entering the state's
juvenile justice system between 1995 and 2001
(TYC, 2002).
- Many of these youth are incarcerated
for minor, non-violent offenses. A review
in Louisiana found that 73% of youth in Louisiana
were incarcerated for non-violent offenses.
A similar review in Texas found 67% (Schwank et
al., 2003).
- There is concern that the juvenile
justice system is becoming the system of "last
resort" for many youth. A 1999 survey by
the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill
(NAMI)found that 36% of their respondents
reported having to place their children in
the juvenile justice system in order to access
mental health services that were otherwise
unavailable to them (NAMI, 1999). A more
recent study conducted by the U.S. General
Accounting Office (GAO) found that in 2001,
parents placed over 12,700 children into
the child welfare or juvenile justice systems
in order to access mental health services
(GAO, July 2003).
Key
Issue 5: Despite this
bleak picture, we are seeing signs of improvement
with the availability of new and effective tools
and services that are demonstrating real promise
for youth involved with the juvenile justice system.
- We now have screening and assessment
tools that have been specifically designed for
use with youth in the juvenile justice system.
The development of the MAYSI-2, a 52 item self-report
screening tool, and the V-DISC, a computer operated,
voice-activated diagnostic assessment tool, are
being used in numerous states and juvenile justice
settings across the country. (The MAYSI is being
used in 45 states and in 28 of those states being
used system-wide. The V-DISC is now in 15 states
with plans for expansion).
- We now have improved psychosocial approaches,
such as cognitive behavioral therapy and dialectical
behavior therapy which are both showing tremendous
promise.
- Increasing use of evidence-based practices,
such as MST, FFT and OTFC, which are family and
community based interventions. Numerous reviews
(Elliott, 1998) have consistently found positive
outcomes associated with their use with youth in
the jj system:
- Reduced long-term rates of re-arrest
- Improved family functioning and school
performance
- Decreased substance use and psychiatric
symptoms
- Reduced rates of out of home placement
- Significant Cost Savings (Aos et
al., 2001)
- While not "evidence-based," we have
seen the development of promising interagency collaborative
models involving the mental health and juvenile
justice systems including:
- System of Care models that target youth
in the juvenile justice system such
as WrapAround Milwaukee and Project Hope,
RI.
- Diversion collaboratives such as NYS's
PINS Diversion program and Texas ' Special
Needs Diversionary Program
- Partnerships with universities such
as the Prime Time program in Seattle
involving the University of Washington
and King County.
Key
Issue 6: There is certainly
much activity underway but more needs to happen.
- Need to make sure that policy makers
recognize how critical an issue this is.
- Many of the youth involved with
the jj system are in for relatively minor
offenses. Diversion programs need to be developed
and we need to push for more community-based treatment
options that will provide treatment to
these youth in their communities- the research
suggests that this is the most effective approach.
- While we're doing a better job
at screening and assessment, we need to
push for universal screening for all youth entering
the jj system, and further evaluations,
when necessary.
- Treatment services need to be improved
for those youth who are placed in secure
facilities.
- Re-entry programs for youth transitioning
out of residential placement need to be strengthened.
References
Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, E., Leib, R. (2001) The
Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs to Reduce
Crime. Olympia , WA : Washington State Institute
for Public Policy.
Cocozza, J., Skowyra, K. (2000) Youth with Mental
Health Disorders: Issues and Emerging Responses. Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Journal, 7(1).
Department of Justice. (2003) Press Release dated
January 17, 2003 . Retrieved February 28, 2003 from www.usdoj.gov .
Elliott, D. (Ed.) (1998-2002) Blueprints for
Violence Prevention Series (Vols. 1-12).
Boulder , CO : Center for the Study and Prevention
of Violence.
National Alliance for the Mentally Ill. (2001) Families
on the Brink: The Impact of Ignoring Children with
Serious Mental Illness. Arlington , VA : National
Alliance for the Mentally Ill.
Otto, R., Greenstein, J., Johnson, M., Friedman,
R. (1992) Prevalence of Mental Disorders Among
Youth in the Juvenile Justice System. In Cocozza,
J. (Ed.) Responding to the Mental Health Needs of
Youth in the Juvenile Justice System. Seattle , WA
: National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the
Criminal Justice System.
Reyes, L., Brantley, D. (2002) Council of Juvenile
Justice Correctional Administrators Best Practices
Committee: Texas Youth Commission
Mental Health Presentation , January 2002.
Schwank, J., Espinosa, E., Tolbert, V. (2003) Mental
Health and Juvenile Justice in Texas . Austin
, TX : Texas Juvenile Probation Commission.
Teplin, L., Abram, K., McClelland, G., Dulcan, M.,
Mericle, A. (2002) Psychiatric Disorders in Youth
in Juvenile Detention. Archives of General Psychiatry,
59(12).
United States Department of Health and Human Services.
(2002) Report of the Surgeon General's Conference
on Children's Mental Health: A National Action Agenda. Washington
, DC : Department of Health and Human Services.
United States General Accounting Office. (2003) Child
Welfare and Juvenile Justice. Washington ,
DC : United States General Accounting Office.
Virginia Policy Design Team. (1994) Mental Health
Needs of Youth in Virginia 's
Juvenile Detention Centers. Richmond , VA
: Virginia Policy Design Team.
Wierson, M., Forehand, R., Frame, C. (1992) Epidemiology
and Treatment of Mental Health Problems in Juvenile
Delinquents. Advances in Behavior Research
and Therapy, 14.